October 20, 2026
An accounts meeting can pass quickly without resolving the question that made a business owner arrange it. The figures may be explained accurately, yet the owner leaves unsure whether a new service is worth keeping, why a busy month felt unproductive or what information to collect next. Preparation helps turn a discussion about records into a discussion about the business.
You do not need to arrive with a polished presentation. A reliable set of information, a short explanation of unusual events and two or three decisions are more useful. The purpose is to give the accountant enough context to distinguish an accounting issue from an operational one and to identify where the evidence is still incomplete.
Ask which period the review will cover and what records should be available. A meeting about the previous financial year has a different purpose from one about a recent change in trading. Confirming the period prevents people from discussing different versions of the business without realising it.
Make sure the records requested have been supplied in the agreed format. For a limited company, GOV.UK’s record-keeping guidance includes money received and spent, assets, debts and the relevant supporting documents needed for accounts and tax returns. Your accountant can explain what is required for your particular business structure and circumstances. New businesses can also start with these UK accounting basics for startups before the first review.
Identify missing information openly. A receipt that has not been found or a sales report that covers only part of the period should be labelled as such. Filling a gap with an assumption may make the paperwork look complete while making the discussion less reliable. Ask how the gap should be resolved.
Keep a note of which reports are final and which may still change. If corrections have been made since an earlier version was circulated, make that clear. Simple version control prevents time being spent explaining differences that arise only because two people have opened different files.
A report can record a result without explaining what happened in the business. Perhaps a key employee was absent, a supplier changed its minimum order or a large project needed extra work before completion. Those events may be important even when they do not have a convenient label in the bookkeeping system.
Write a short timeline of material changes during the period. Include when they happened, which part of the business they affected and whether you expect them to recur. Avoid turning it into a defence of every disappointing figure. The aim is to help the discussion distinguish an isolated event from a continuing problem.
For example, a service business may have completed more jobs while spending substantially more staff time on each one. That is a useful question to investigate. It does not, by itself, prove that prices should rise or that a particular customer is unprofitable. The review can establish what additional information is needed before reaching a conclusion.
Separate observations from explanations. “We revisited three jobs” is an observation. “The new scheduling system caused the problem” is a possible explanation. Presenting them separately gives the accountant room to test the financial effect without inheriting an unsupported diagnosis.
Choose a small number of business questions before the meeting. These might concern the cost of introducing a service, the information needed before hiring or the way different activities are reported. A specific question gives the discussion a useful destination. Your accountant is one of several professionals who can help an online business, so it is worth knowing which questions belong with them.
When approaching an accountancy practice such as Anova, explain the decision behind the request for a review. “I want to understand whether this service covers the resources it uses” is more informative than “I would like better reports”. It allows the scope of the work and the information required to be discussed at the outset.
Ask which figures are useful for the question and what their limitations are. A total for the whole business may hide variation between activities. Equally, a detailed breakdown can create false confidence if time or costs have been allocated inconsistently. More columns do not automatically produce a better answer.
Use scenarios to identify the information that matters. Discuss what would change if demand were lower than expected or if a project took longer to deliver. Treat these as planning exercises rather than predictions. Any tax treatment or formal accounting judgement should be considered with a qualified accountant using the facts of the business.
If several people will attend, agree who can explain each part of the records. Someone who manages bookings may hold different information from the person responsible for purchases. Sharing a short written agenda gives each person time to prepare. During the meeting, note questions that need checking rather than allowing an uncertain recollection to become the basis of a subsequent decision.
Reserve time at the end to agree what happens next. For each action, identify who will do it, what information is needed and when it should be reviewed. “Improve the records” is difficult to complete. “Provide the missing supplier statements before the next review” is a clear task.
Check your understanding in ordinary language. Explain what you think a figure means and how you intend to use it. This gives the accountant a chance to correct a misunderstanding before it affects a decision. There is little value in leaving with terminology that you cannot confidently apply.
Keep the resulting note short enough to revisit. Record decisions separately from ideas still being explored and retain any assumptions that materially affect the conclusion. If new evidence arrives, it should be possible to see which part of the discussion needs updating.
A useful review leaves the business with clearer questions as well as answers. Preparing the records, explaining the context and agreeing practical follow-up makes the time more productive. Over successive meetings, that routine can help the owner understand how daily choices appear in the accounts and what evidence should guide the next decision.
Bring the records for the agreed period, such as money received and spent, supplier statements, sales reports and supporting documents. Label anything that is missing or incomplete so the gap can be discussed openly rather than filled with an assumption.
Confirm the period being reviewed, gather the agreed records and write a short timeline of material changes. Then choose two or three business questions you want the discussion to help answer.
An observation is something you can show, such as three jobs being revisited. An explanation is a possible cause. Keeping them apart lets your accountant test the financial effect without relying on an unsupported diagnosis.
Agree who will do what, what information is needed and when it will be reviewed. Keep a short note that records decisions separately from ideas still being explored.
Any tax treatment or formal accounting judgement should be considered with a qualified accountant using the facts of your business, so ask them to explain how it applies to your situation.
The Entrepreneurs Guide to Launching a Fast, Lean and Profitable Online Venture.
This is where the magic happens.
